RICHARDS v. CORIZON HEALTH et al
| DANNY R. RICHARDS |
| ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, RICHARD BROWN, CHAVEZ, CORIZON HEALTH and KIM HOBSON |
| WVCF (Court Use Only) |
| 2:2018cv00165 |
| April 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Terre Haute Office |
| William T. Lawrence |
| Doris L. Pryor |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
229
ENTRY - The plaintiff's motion to expedite ruling on defendants' motion for summary judgment, dkt. 223 , is denied as moot, as the Court issued its ruling and dismissed this action on August 3, 2020. Dkts. 221 , 222 . Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 8/20/2020. (KAA)
|
|
Filing
221
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - The defendants motion for summary judgment, dkt. 190 , is GRANTED. Mr. Richards' motion for ruling on defendants' motion for summary judgment, dkt. 220 , is GRANTED to the extent this Entry is issued today. Because all claims have now been resolved, final judgment shall enter. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 8/3/2020. (KAA)
|
|
Filing
63
ENTRY GRANTING DEFENDANTS' DR. CHAVEZ AND CORIZON'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - Defendants' Dr. Chavez and Corizon's motion for summary judgment, dkt. 45 , is granted. Mr. Richards's claims against these defendants are dismissed without prejudice. No partial judgment shall enter at this time. The only remaining defendants in this action are Dr. Denning and Wexford. The clerk is instructed to update the docket to reflect that defendants Dr. Chavez and Corizon have been dismissed from this action. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 11/1/2018. (DMW)
|
|
Filing
24
ENTRY Screening Second Amended Complaint and Directing Service of Process - The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendants Dr. Denning, Corizon, and Wexford in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the second amended complaint, Dkt. No. 15, applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. Dr. Chavez has already appeared in this action. He is d irected to file an answer within thirtydays of the date of this Entry. The clerk is directed to issue process to defendants Dr. Denning, Corizon Health, andWexford Health Sources.The clerk is directed to update the docket to show that the defendants in this action are Dr.Chavez, Dr. Denning, Corizon Health, and Wexford Health Sources.The clerk is directed to update the docket to show that the amended complaint appearingat docket 15 should be re-named the "second amended complaint." (SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 6/13/2018. Copies distributed pursuant to distribution list. (DW)
|
|
Filing
12
ENTRY - Here, the plaintiff's complaint was screened by the Court on April 18, 2018. The Court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim but gave the plaintiff an opportunity to file an amended complaint. See Dkt. No. 8. The pla intiff has filed a motion to amend complaint that the Court construes as the amended complaint. The clerk is instructed to docket the motion to amend complaint found at docket 10 as the amended complaint. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendants Dr. Chavez, Dr. Byrd, and Dr. Denning in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the newly docketed amended complaint, applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request fo r Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. The clerk is instructed to update the docket to show that the defendants in this action are Dr. Chavez, Dr. Byrd, and Dr. Denning (SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 5/14/2018. Copies distributed pursuant to distribution list. (DW)
|
|
Filing
8
Entry Screening Complaint, Dismissing Insufficient Claims, and Directing Further Proceedings - The plaintiff, Danny Richards's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt. No. 3 , is granted. Richards is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Five Dollars and Forty-Three Cents ($5.43). He shall have through May 17, 2018, to pay this sum to the clerk. The clerk is instructed to update the docket to reflect that Aramart is correctly spelled Aramark. The dismissal of the co mplaint will not in this instance lead to the dismissal of the action at present. Instead, the plaintiffs shall have through May 17, 2018, in which to file an amended complaint. Richards's motion for assistance to serve summons, Dkt. No. 4 , is denied as unnecessary. Richards's motion for preliminary injunction, Dkt. No. 6 , is denied (SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 4/18/2018. (DW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
