FRENCH v. BROWN
| ROMAN FRENCH |
| DICK BROWN |
| 2:2019cv00039 |
| January 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Grievous Loss , filed by Respondent DICK BROWN. (Cornelius, Katherine) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Grievous Loss, filed by Respondent DICK BROWN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Report of Disciplinary Hearing, #2 Exhibit B - OIS Report)(Cornelius, Katherine) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine A. Cornelius on behalf of Respondent DICK BROWN. (Cornelius, Katherine) |
| Filing 5 RECEIPT #IP063858 for filing fee in the amount of $5.00, paid by Petitioner. (DJH) |
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Discipline Case) - Petitioner Roman French's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges his disciplinary conviction in WVE 18-09- 0059 on October 30, 2018. The petitioner shall have through February 26, 2019, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate his financial inability to do so. The custodian of petitioner is directed to answer the allegations of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. This shall be done within forty-two (42) days of the date this Entry is signed. The petitioner shall have twenty-eight (28) days after service of such answer or return to order to show cause on him in which to reply. (See Order.) (Show Cause Response due by 3/8/2019.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/25/2019. (DMW)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (HET) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by ROMAN FRENCH. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(HET) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by ROMAN FRENCH located at WVCF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by ROMAN FRENCH to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (HET) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: FRENCH v. BROWN | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ROMAN FRENCH | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: DICK BROWN | |
| Represented By: | Katherine A. Cornelius |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
