Cases 1 - 10 of 22
FRENCH v. ENGLISH
as 1:2026cv01328
Petitioner:
ROMAN FRENCH
Respondent:
BRIAN ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FRENCH v. ENGLISH
as 1:2026cv01327
Petitioner:
ROMAN FRENCH
Respondent:
BRIAN ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
French v. Warden
as 3:2025cv00212
Petitioner:
Roman L French and Roman French
Respondent:
Warden
Unknown:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
French v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00632
Petitioner:
Roman L French and Roman French
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roman French v. Robert Bennett, et al
as 23-2268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROMAN FRENCH
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT BENNETT, Major, Miami Correctional Facility, MICHAEL GAPSKI, Grievance Specialist, Miami Correctional Facility and WARDEN, MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
FRENCH v. VOIGHTSCHILD et al
as 2:2022cv00546
Plaintiff:
ROMAN L FRENCH and ROMAN FRENCH
Defendant:
M VOIGHTSCHILD, EWERS, PARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French v. Bennett et al
as 3:2022cv00965
Plaintiff:
Roman L French and Roman French
Defendant:
Robert Bennett, Michael Gapski and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French v. Voightschild et al
as 3:2022cv00967
Plaintiff:
Roman L French and Roman French
Defendant:
M Voightschild, Ewers, Parr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00174
Petitioner:
Roman L French and Roman French
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FRENCH v. WARDEN
as 2:2020cv00482
Plaintiff:
ROMAN L FRENCH and ROMAN FRENCH
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
