O'MALLEY-STARR v. EATON et al
| AARON O'MALLEY-STARR |
| I.D.O.C WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, GREG EATON, DICK BROWN, JAY HENDRIX and KIM HOBSON |
| 2:2019cv00056 |
| February 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 RECEIPT #IP064465 for Partial fee in the amount of $4.77, paid by Plaintiff. (HET) |
Filing 11
ORDER - denying #9 Motion to Appoint Counsel without prejudice as premature. (See Order.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 3/5/2019. (RSF)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER - granting #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Four Dollars and Seventy-Seven Cents ($4.77). See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). The plaintiff shall have through March 28, 2019, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. (See Order.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 3/5/2019. (RSF)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Assistance with Recruiting Counsel, filed by Plaintiff AARON O'MALLEY-STARR. (DMW) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff AARON O'MALLEY-STARR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(DMW) Modified on 2/14/2019 (DMW). (Main Document 8 replaced on 2/14/2019) (DMW). |
| Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by AARON O'MALLEY-STARR. (DMW) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against GREG EATON, JAY HENDRIX, DICK BROWN, KIM HOBSON, filed by AARON O'MALLEY-STARR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons)(DMW) |
| Filing 5 ENTRY DISMISSING COMPLAINT AND DIRECTING FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT - Because the Court has been unable to identify a viable claim for relief against any particular defendant, the complaint is subject to dismissal. It appears that the plaintiff could amend his complaint to include a claim based on the denial of medical care if he is able to identify an individual responsible for denying him treatment. Accordingly, the dismissal of the complaint will not in this instance lead to the dismissal of the action at present. Instead, the plaintiff shall have through March 1, 2019, to file an amended complaint. (See Entry.) Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 2/4/2019. (DMW) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is denied as presented. He shall have until March 1, 2019, in which to renew his motion to proceed in forma pauperis by attaching a copy of the transactions associated with his institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action on February 1, 2019. (See Order.) Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 2/4/2019. (DMW)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (HET) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff AARON O'MALLEY-STARR. (HET) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against I.D.O.C WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, filed by AARON O'MALLEY-STARR. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Letter, #2 Proposed Summons)(HET) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
