YOUNG v. SMITH
Petitioner: DAVID R. YOUNG
Respondent: BRIAN SMITH
Case Number: 2:2019cv00359
Filed: July 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mark J Dinsmore
Referring Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time - granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time. No later than October 7, 2019, the respondent shall either file his return to the show cause order or a motion to dismiss the petition. Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/9/2019. (DMW)
September 6, 2019 Filing 10 First MOTION for Extension of Time to 10/10/2019 in which to #4 Order to Show Cause (Disciplinary) , filed by Respondent BRIAN SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Disciplinary hearing report, #2 Exhibit B OIS Report, #3 Exhibit C Disciplinary Code, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Corey, David)
August 14, 2019 Filing 9 Resent dkts 2 and 4 to plaintiff at new address per dkt 7. (MEH) Modified on 8/14/2019 (MEH).
August 12, 2019 Filing 8 Mail Returned as undeliverable. Not at Putnamville Correctional Facility. #4 Order to Show Cause (Disciplinary) sent to DAVID R. YOUNG, Putnamville Correctional Facility, 1946 West US Hwy 140, Greencastle, IN 46135. (DMW)
August 12, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address for DAVID R. YOUNG to 8959 S. Peoga Rd., Trafalgar, IN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (DMW)
August 12, 2019 Filing 6 Mail Returned as undeliverable. Not at Putnamville Correctional Facility #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Magistrate Judge's Notice of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction sent to DAVID R. YOUNG, 1946 West US Hwy 140, Greencastle, IN 46135. (DMW)
August 8, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by David Corey on behalf of Respondent BRIAN SMITH. (Corey, David)
July 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Discipline Case) - David R. Young's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges his disciplinary conviction on April 3, 2019. The custodian of petitioner is directed to answer the allegations of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. Show Cause Response due by 9/11/2019. (See Order.) Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/31/2019. (DMW)
July 30, 2019 Filing 3 RECEIPT #IP066030 for filing fee in the amount of $5.00, paid by Petitioner. (DJH)
July 29, 2019 Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (MAC)
July 26, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by DAVID R. YOUNG. (No fee paid with this filing). (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(MAC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: YOUNG v. SMITH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: DAVID R. YOUNG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: BRIAN SMITH
Represented By: David Corey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?