YOUNG v. SMITH
DAVID R. YOUNG |
BRIAN SMITH |
2:2019cv00359 |
July 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mark J Dinsmore |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time - granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time. No later than October 7, 2019, the respondent shall either file his return to the show cause order or a motion to dismiss the petition. Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/9/2019. (DMW) |
Filing 10 First MOTION for Extension of Time to 10/10/2019 in which to #4 Order to Show Cause (Disciplinary) , filed by Respondent BRIAN SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Disciplinary hearing report, #2 Exhibit B OIS Report, #3 Exhibit C Disciplinary Code, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Corey, David) |
Filing 9 Resent dkts 2 and 4 to plaintiff at new address per dkt 7. (MEH) Modified on 8/14/2019 (MEH). |
Filing 8 Mail Returned as undeliverable. Not at Putnamville Correctional Facility. #4 Order to Show Cause (Disciplinary) sent to DAVID R. YOUNG, Putnamville Correctional Facility, 1946 West US Hwy 140, Greencastle, IN 46135. (DMW) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address for DAVID R. YOUNG to 8959 S. Peoga Rd., Trafalgar, IN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (DMW) |
Filing 6 Mail Returned as undeliverable. Not at Putnamville Correctional Facility #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Magistrate Judge's Notice of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction sent to DAVID R. YOUNG, 1946 West US Hwy 140, Greencastle, IN 46135. (DMW) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by David Corey on behalf of Respondent BRIAN SMITH. (Corey, David) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Discipline Case) - David R. Young's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges his disciplinary conviction on April 3, 2019. The custodian of petitioner is directed to answer the allegations of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. Show Cause Response due by 9/11/2019. (See Order.) Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/31/2019. (DMW) |
Filing 3 RECEIPT #IP066030 for filing fee in the amount of $5.00, paid by Petitioner. (DJH) |
Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (MAC) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by DAVID R. YOUNG. (No fee paid with this filing). (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(MAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: YOUNG v. SMITH | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: DAVID R. YOUNG | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: BRIAN SMITH | |
Represented By: | David Corey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.