LOVE v. BROWN et al
| TONY L. LOVE |
| TIMOTHY WELLINGTON, CHRISTOPHER NICHOLSON, RICHARD BROWN and DUSTY RUSSELL |
| 2:2019cv00550 |
| November 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
AMENDED COMPLAINT against RICHARD BROWN, filed by TONY L. LOVE.(TMC)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER - granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis because the Court finds that plaintiff does not have the assets or means to pay even an initial partial filing fee. Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 11/27/2019. (RSF)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copies to plaintiff by US Mail. (MEH)
|
|
Filing 3
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff TONY L. LOVE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Counselors Statement of Inmate Trust Fund Account; Offender Trust System Transaction History Inquiry). (AKH)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against RICHARD BROWN, CHRISTOPHER NICHOLSON, TIMOTHY WELLINGTON, filed by TONY L. LOVE. (No fee paid with this filing). (AKH)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
