Cases 1 - 10 of 20
MORGAN et al v. RUSSELL et al
as 2:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL W. MORGAN
Defendant:
KAREN FISCHER, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINTUP v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, K. VINARDI, CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOWE v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
EDDIE J. LOWE
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, DUSTY RUSSELL, C. HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOGAN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00294
Plaintiff:
RASHAAD HOGAN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, COWRICK, GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREENLEE v. CARTER et al
as 2:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY GREENLEE
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, FRANK VANIHEL, SHELBY CRICHFIED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHORTER v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SHORTER
Defendant:
C. HOLCOMB, DUSTY MILLER, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael T. Robinson v. Richard Brown, et al
as 22-1105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL T. ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD BROWN, FRANK LITTLEJOHN, KEVIN GILMORE and others
ROBINSON v. BROWN et al
as 2:2021cv00013
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, KENNY MITCHELL, J. MANUEL and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EASTWOOD v. BROWN et al
as 2:2020cv00460
Defendant:
RANDALL PURCELL, KEVIN GILMORE, TRAVIS DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN NOBEL EASTWOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Asher Hill v. Christopher Nicholson, et al
as 20-2460
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASHER B. HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD BROWN, Warden, K. MITCHELL, Maintenance Supervisor, DUSTY RUSSELL, Custody Supervisor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.