CELESTINE v UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
| JOHN A. GOODRIDGE and NARON K. CELESTINE |
| FCI TERRE HAUTE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 2:2020cv00587 |
| November 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Order Screening Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - The plaintiff's claims shall proceed against the United States under the FTCA. The clerk shall terminate FCI Terre Haute and the Federal Bureau of Prisons as defendants. The plaintiff is represented by counsel and has paid the filing fee. Counsel is responsible for effecting service on the defendant in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/10/2020.(KAA)
|
| Filing 4 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (KAA) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (KAA) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John Andrew Goodridge on behalf of Plaintiff JOHN A. GOODRIDGE. (Goodridge, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHN A. GOODRIDGE, filed by JOHN A. GOODRIDGE. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-6257018) (Goodridge, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
