GALE v. WATSON et al
| BRIAN GALE |
| USP TERRE HAUTE, BOP and T. WATSON |
| 2:2021cv00017 |
| January 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Doris L Pryor |
| James R Sweeney |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
FINAL JUDGMENT - For the reasons detailed in the accompanying Order, the Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT in this action in favor of the respondent and against the Petitioner, Brian Gale. Gale's petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied and the action is terminated. Copy sent to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 2/3/2021.(JRB)
|
|
Filing 3
Entry Dismissing Action and Directing Entry of Final Judgment - Based on the foregoing, Gales' petition for writ of habeas corpus shows on its face that he is not entitled to the relief he seeks and that petition is denied. Judgment consistent with this Order shall now issue. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 2/3/2021.(JRB)
|
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by BRIAN GALE. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits including Inmate Financial Plan, Informal Resolution, Administrative Remedy records, #2 Envelope)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
