DICKERSON v. VANIHEL et al
| THOMAS DICKERSON |
| FRANK VANIHEL and KIM HOBSON |
| 2:2021cv00372 |
| September 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mario Garcia |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 ANSWER to #2 Complaint AND STATEMENT OF DEFENSES, filed by KIM HOBSON.(Farrington, Christopher) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by James F. Bleeke on behalf of Defendant KIM HOBSON. (Bleeke, James) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Andrew Farrington on behalf of Defendant KIM HOBSON. (Farrington, Christopher) |
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by KIM HOBSON. KIM HOBSON waiver sent on 11/15/2021. (Crandall, Jeb) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeb Adam Crandall on behalf of Defendant KIM HOBSON. (Crandall, Jeb) |
| Filing 9 Documents to be Sent via Electronic Notice - re #7 Order,, #2 Complaint, #8 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk Electronic Notice to IDOC. (KAA) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk upon: 1) Kim Hobson; 2) Frank Vaniheel. (KAA) |
Filing 7
Order Screening Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - Applying the screening standard to the factual allegations in the complaint, Mr. Dickerson's claims shall proceed against Mr. Vaniheel and Ms. Hobson. If the plaintiff believes that additional claims were alleged in the complaint, but not identified by the Court, he shall have through December 8, 2021, in which to identify those claims. The clerk is directed to issue process to the defendants. The clerk is directed to serve Mr. Vaniheel electronically. Copies distributed pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 11/12/2021.(KAA)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Although the plaintiff is excused from pre-paying the full filing fee, he still must pay the three hundred and fifty dollar ($350.00) filing fee. No initial partial filing fee is due at this time. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 10/6/2021. (KAA)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (TMC) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (KAA) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff THOMAS DICKERSON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(KAA) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against KIM HOBSON, FRANK VANIHEL, filed by THOMAS DICKERSON. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Waiver of Summons)(KAA) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by THOMAS DICKERSON located at WVCF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by THOMAS DICKERSON to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (KAA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
