BUNTON v. FCI TERRE HAUTE
| PAUL BUNTON |
| FCI TERRE HAUTE |
| 2:2021cv00469 |
| December 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE 6-MONTH TRANSACTION REPORT - Plaintiff Paul Bunton brought this action and moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court directed him to submit a copy of his prison trust account transaction history for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. Dkt. 7. Mr. Bunton's deadline to do so was February 22, 2202. That deadline has passed, and Mr. Bunton has failed to comply or take any other action in this case. The Court will provide Mr. Bunton one more chance. He shall have through March 25, 2022, to either (1) submit a copy of his prison trust account transaction history for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action or (2) pay the $402 filing fee. Failure to comply with this deadline will result in dismissal without further notice. Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/23/2022.(KAA)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through February 22, 2022, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: Your motion to proceed in forma pauperis cannot be ruled on because you have not submitted a copy of the transaction history associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail). (JRT) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Submit Evidence, filed by Plaintiff PAUL BUNTON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by PAUL BUNTON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(TPS) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US Mail. (TMC) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (TPS) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff PAUL BUNTON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(TPS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FCI TERRE HAUTE, filed by PAUL BUNTON. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(TPS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BUNTON v. FCI TERRE HAUTE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: PAUL BUNTON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FCI TERRE HAUTE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
