SCUTERI v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI |
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CENTURION SERVICES, ARAMARK, PEREZ, JADE REEDY, DUSHAN ZATECKY, SARGENT, HARRIS and FRENCH |
2:2023cv00103 |
March 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mark J Dinsmore |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Order Granting Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis - Plaintiff has moved to proceed without pre-paying the filing fee. These motions, dkts. [3, 11], are GRANTED. His motion for an extension of time to correct the Notice of Deficiency, dkt. #8 , is GRANTED TO THE EXTENT that the Court issues this Order. His motion challenging the constitutionality of 28 U.S.C. 1915, dkt. #9 , is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/28/2023. (KAA) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric Ryan Shouse on behalf of Defendant INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. (Shouse, Eric) |
Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI.(JDC) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(JDC) |
Filing 10 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI. (JDC) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Challenge the Constitutionality of 28 USC 1915, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI. (JDC) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to Correct Deficiency, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit existing es consent)(JDC) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through April 10, 2023 in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: Mr. Scuteri must submit an amended trust fund account statement for the period from September 8, 2022, to March 8, 2023. His deadline to submit his amended trust fund account statement is April 10, 2023. Failure to meet this deadline may result in dismissal of the lawsuit. (TPS) |
Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (MEH) |
Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DRB) |
Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DRB) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(DRB) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against ARAMARK, CENTURION SERVICES, FRENCH, HARRIS, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PEREZ, JADE REEDY, SARGENT, DUSHAN ZATECKY, filed by MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(DRB) |
Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI located at PUTNAMVILLE CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (DRB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.