Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Myers v. City of Dayton, OH et al
as 3:2026cv00262
Plaintiff:
Gregory S Myers
Defendant:
City of Dayton, OH, Kyrsten French and The Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of Dayton, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
French v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2026cv03236
Plaintiff:
Marcellus French
Defendant:
J B Pritzker and Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
French v. American Economy Insurance Company
as 1:2026cv03255
Plaintiff:
Gregory French
Defendant:
American Economy Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
French v. American Economy Insurance Company
as 1:2026cv03213
Plaintiff:
Gregory French
Defendant:
American Economy Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Lewis v. French, et al.
as 26-4536
Plaintiff:
DARONTA T. LEWIS
Defendant:
A. FRENCH, TRENT ALLEN, GAVIN NEWSOM and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Mason v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv05918
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Mason doing business as French Knot
Defendant:
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and inclusive Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
FRENCH v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2026cv04798
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY FRENCH
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
FRENCH v. THOMPSON TRUCKING, INC.
as 2:2026cv04572
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN FRENCH
Defendant:
MICHAEL KUNTZ and THOMPSON TRUCKING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
