Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
BURRESS-EL v. DUKE ENERGY, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv02967
Plaintiff: ANTUAN BURRESS-EL
Defendant: ROCCO O. D'ASENZO, BOB MCMAHON, LARISA M. VAYSMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
WILDERNESS WORKSHOP et al v. HARRELL et al
as 1:2023cv00678
Plaintiff: WILDERNESS WORKSHOP and ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD
Defendant: Meryl Harrell, CHRIS FRENCH, Frank Beum and others
Intervenor Defendant: BERLAIMONT ESTATES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
ENFORCEMENT OF FRENCH RESTRAINING ORDERS TO RESTRAIN ALL FUNDS HELD BY COINBASE IN THE NAMES OF DRISS TOUHAMY AND CHUCK PACHECCO et al
as 1:2021mc00106
In Re: ENFORCEMENT OF FRENCH RESTRAINING ORDERS TO RESTRAIN ALL FUNDS HELD BY COINBASE IN THE NAMES OF DRISS TOUHAMY AND CHUCK PACHECCO
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01255
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2020cv03485
Plaintiff: WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP HOSPITAL DISTRICT doing business as WASHINGTON HOSPITAL, COUNTY OF KERN doing business as KERN MEDICAL CENTER, DIGNITY HEALTH doing business as ST. MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant: ALEX M. AZAR, II, XAVIER BECERRA and NORRIS COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
FRENCH v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv02248
Plaintiff: DWAYNE E. FRENCH
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ACKLEY et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00621
Plaintiff: MARSHALL L. BENEWAY, ANDREW K. CROFT, CRAIG J. DICK and others
Defendant: ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5227
Plaintiff / Appellee: Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital, Northeast Georgia Medical Center, 14cv503 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Fort Payne Hospital Corporation, 14cv1477, doing business as Dekalb Regional Medical Center, Siloam Springs Arkansas Hospital Company, Llc, 14cv1477, doing business as Siloam Springs Arkansas Hospital Company, Llc, Lafayette General Medical Center, 15-cv-01800 and others
Defendant / Appellee: Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5082
Plaintiff / Appellee: Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, Palmerton Hospital-Carbon, 16-cv-01543, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Lubbock County Hospital District, 14cv503, doing business as University Medical Center, Board Of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital, 14cv503, doing business as North Kansas City Hospital, Community Hospital of Brazosport, 14cv503, doing business as Brazosport Regional Health System and others
Defendant / Appellee: Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-5087
Plaintiff / Appellee: Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital, Memorial Hospital Flagler, Inc., 15cv192 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Fort Payne Hospital Corporation, 14cv1477, doing business as Dekalb Regional Medical Center, Longmont United Hospital, 15-cv-01800, Willis-Knighton Medical Center, 15-cv-01800 and others
Defendant / Appellee: Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?