GARRETT v. HOLCOMB et al
MARKESE GARRETT |
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, CHRISTINA REAGLE, JACK HENDRIX, JAMES BASINGER, FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, RANDY VANVLEET, SHAWN HOLCOMB, YARBER, MATTHEW LEOHR, VANSCHAYCH, BRIAN LALOUX, ASHLEY MOSELEY, RANDALL PURCELL, JERRY SNYDER, KATHERINE FISCHER, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, MARY SIMS, SARAH CLARKE and SCOTT |
2:2024cv00117 |
April 9, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
M Kendra Klump |
James R Sweeney |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (CCG) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CCG) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MARKESE GARRETT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(CCG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JAMES BASINGER, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, SARAH CLARKE, KATHERINE FISCHER, KEVIN GILMORE, JACK HENDRIX, ERIC J. HOLCOMB, SHAWN HOLCOMB, BRIAN LALOUX, MATTHEW LEOHR, ASHLEY MOSELEY, RANDALL PURCELL, CHRISTINA REAGLE, SCOTT, MARY SIMS, JERRY SNYDER, FRANK VANIHEL, VANSCHAYCH, RANDY VANVLEET, YARBER, filed by MARKESE GARRETT. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(CCG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.