Cases 1 - 10 of 10
FINCHER v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
TRAVON FINCHER
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, CHRISTINA REAGLE, JACK HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARRETT v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
MARKESE GARRETT
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, CHRISTINA REAGLE, JACK HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORR v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv01831
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, CHRISTINA REAGLE, ROBERT CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AKARD v. CARTER et al
as 2:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY E. AKARD
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, DICK BROWN, MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AKARD v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01164
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY E. AKARD
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, DICK BROWN, MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARRETT v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Howard Garrett
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Executive Director RICHARD BROWN, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curt Lowder v. Lori Cardinal, et al
as 19-3057
Defendant / Appellee:
LORI CARDINAL, KATHERINE FISCHER and BARBARA RIGGS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURT LOWDER
Curt Lowder v. Lori Cardinal, et al
as 19-2871
Defendant / Appellee:
LORI CARDINAL, KATHERINE FISCHER and BARBARA RIGGS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURT LOWDER
Katherine Fischer v. Gasket Mfg. Co., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-62174
Plaintiff:
Katherine Fischer
Defendant:
Gasket Mfg. Co
FISCHER v. GASKET MFG. CO. et al
as 2:2009cv62174
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE FISCHER
Defendant:
GASKET MFG. CO., INC. AQUA-CHEM, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
