AKARD v. CARTER et al
JEFFREY E. AKARD |
ROBERT CARTER, DICK BROWN, MARK SEVIER, K. EWERS, S. FISCHER, KATHERINE FISCHER, HOWARD, WOOSLEY, STOVALL, HENDERSON, JOHN OR JANE DOE FOR LEXIS NEXIS and FRANK VANLHEL |
2:2022cv00338 |
August 10, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mark J Dinsmore |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Case transferred in from Indianapolis Division on 08/10/2022 Case Number 1:22-cv-1164. Case assigned to Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson and Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore., filed by JEFFREY E. AKARD. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. (JSR) |
Filing 12 ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of JEFFREY E. AKARD. Copy to Plaintiff and Warden via US Mail. Copy to Finance Department. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 7/29/2022.(SWM) |
Filing 10 RECEIPT #995 for partial filing fee in the amount of $42.04, paid by JEFFREY AKARD. (DJH) |
Filing 11 NOTICE to the Court of incorrect mail routing, filed by Plaintiff JEFFREY E. AKARD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JSR) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address for JEFFREY E. AKARD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (CKM) (Attachment 1 replaced on 7/18/2022) (CKM). |
Filing 8 MOTION to Clarify, filed by Plaintiff JEFFREY E. AKARD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (CKM) (Attachment 1 replaced on 7/18/2022) (CKM). |
Filing 7 MOTION for Order Placing #1 Complaint Under Seal, filed by Plaintiff JEFFREY E. AKARD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (CKM) (Attachment 1 replaced on 7/18/2022) (CKM). |
Filing 6 Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Forty-Two Dollars and Four Cents ($42.04). See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). The plaintiff shall have through July 21, 2022, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. The plaintiff is informed that after the initial partial filing fee is paid, he will be obligated to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income each month that the amount in his account exceeds $10.00, until the full filing fee of $350.00 is paid. 28 U.S. C. 1915(b)(2). After the initial partial filing fee is received, a collection order will be issued to the plaintiff and the plaintiff's custodian, and the Court will screen the complaint in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915A. (Copy distributed pursuant to distribution list) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/23/2022. (JDC) |
Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
Filing 3 MOTION to File Memorandum of Law, filed by Plaintiff JEFFREY E. AKARD. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Envelope)(JRB) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff JEFFREY E. AKARD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(JRB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DICK BROWN, ROBERT CARTER, K. EWERS, KATHERINE FISCHER, S. FISCHER, HENDERSON, HOWARD, filed by JEFFREY E. AKARD. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Envelope)(JRB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.