Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Howard v. Bartels
as 3:2026cv00937
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Howard
Defendant:
Ashlyn Bartels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY v. LUTNICK et al
as 1:2026cv02397
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant:
HOWARD LUTNICK, EUGENIO PIEIRO SOLER and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1540 Endangered Species Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Wood v. Cheek et al
as 2:2026cv02105
Petitioner:
Howard Togo Wood, Jr.
Respondent:
Jim Cheek and Tim Griffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Makkawi v. City of New York et al
as 1:2026cv04018
Plaintiff:
Mone Makkawi, Rohaan Gill, Arib Hasan and others
Defendant:
City of New York, Timothy J. Beaudette, Joel A. Mottola and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Winegar, et al. v. Howard, et al.
as 4:2026cv00419
Plaintiff:
Tyler Winegar and Steve Winegar
Defendant:
MUHAMMAD Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
