FINCHER v. HOLCOMB et al
| TRAVON FINCHER |
| ERIC J. HOLCOMB, CHRISTINA REAGLE, JACK HENDRIX, FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, RANDY VANVLEET, YARBER, MATHEW LEOHR, VANSCHAYCH, BRAIN LALOUX, ASHLEY MOSELEY, RANDALL PURCELL, JERRY SNYDER, KATHERINE FISCHER, JACQUELYNNE PORTER-MARTS, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, MARY SIMS, SARAH CLARKE and SCOTT |
| 2:2024cv00129 |
| April 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (CCG) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CCG) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff TRAVON FINCHER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(CCG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, SARAH CLARKE, KATHERINE FISCHER, KEVIN GILMORE, JACK HENDRIX, ERIC J. HOLCOMB, BRAIN LALOUX, MATHEW LEOHR, ASHLEY MOSELEY, JACQUELYNNE PORTER-MARTS, RANDALL PURCELL, CHRISTINA REAGLE, SCOTT, MARY SIMS, JERRY SNYDER, FRANK VANIHEL, VANSCHAYCH, RANDY VANVLEET, YARBER, filed by TRAVON FINCHER. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(CCG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
