PARCHMAN v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE et al
Plaintiff: ELIJAH PARCHMAN
Defendant: SEVERAL UNKNOWN OFFICERS, EPD and CITY OF EVANSVILLE
Interested Party: DAVID WEDDING
Case Number: 3:2020cv00131
Filed: June 3, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Matthew P Brookman
Referring Judge: Richard L Young
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE of Compliance, filed by Interested Party DAVID WEDDING (Jones, David)
July 1, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by David L. Jones on behalf of Interested Party DAVID WEDDING. (Jones, David)
June 17, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ELIJAH PARCHMAN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB)
June 17, 2020 Filing 5 Addendum to Complaint, filed by Plaintiff ELIJAH PARCHMAN (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JRB)
June 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ENTRY Directing Further Proceedings - The clerk is directed to include a form motion to proceed in forma pauperis with the plaintiff's copy of this Entry. Because the plaintiff asserts that the jail will not provide a copy of the trust account absent a court order, the clerk is directed to send a copy of this Entry to the Vanderburgh County Sheriff. Copy to Plaintiff and Vanderburgh County Sheriff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 6/4/2020. (Attachments: #1 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis)(AAS)
June 4, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC)
June 3, 2020 Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO)
June 3, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CITY OF EVANSVILLE, SEVERAL UNKNOWN OFFICERS, EPD, filed by ELIJAH PARCHMAN. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Prisoner Authorization, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Letter re: account statement)(REO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PARCHMAN v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ELIJAH PARCHMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SEVERAL UNKNOWN OFFICERS, EPD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF EVANSVILLE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: DAVID WEDDING
Represented By: David L. Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?