Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Illinois Casualty Company v. City of Evansville
as 26-2520
Plaintiff:
ILLINOIS CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, INDIANA
COLE v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE et al
as 3:2026cv00162
Plaintiff:
TYRIEK S. COLE
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, WILLIAM ARBAUGH, JESSE MONTANK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COLE v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE et al
as 3:2026cv00073
Plaintiff:
TYRIEK S. COLE
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, DIANA MOERS, BRIAN KEITH SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAYES v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE et al
as 3:2026cv00030
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY MAYES
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, J. MONTGOMERY, N. PITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COLE v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE et al
as 3:2026cv00024
Plaintiff:
TYRIEK SEDRIK COLE
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, BROWN, GREGORY HARDIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. State of Kentucky et al
as 4:2026cv00025
Plaintiff:
Nikolas Lewis
Defendant:
State of Kentucky, State of Texas, State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ILLINOIS CASUALTY COMPANY v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE
as 3:2025cv00256
Plaintiff:
ILLINOIS CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
JACKSON v. M. MANSFIELD et al
as 3:2025cv00211
Plaintiff:
CALVIN JACKSON
Defendant:
M. MANSFIELD, CODY BRANDENSTEIN, VANDERBURGH COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dylan Marshall v. City of Evansville, Indiana, et al
as 25-2583
Plaintiff:
DYLAN MARSHALL
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, INDIANA, EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, SAM SEDORIS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
