WALSMAN v. BURGESS et al
| LEVI WALSMAN |
| DUANE BURGESS, CURRY and RANSDELL |
| 3:2020cv00219 |
| September 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Richard L Young |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by William W. Barrett on behalf of Defendants CURRY, RANSDELL. (Barrett, William) |
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by RANSDELL, CURRY. RANSDELL waiver sent on 11/2/2020; CURRY waiver sent on 11/2/2020. (Paul, Daniel) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel J. Paul on behalf of Defendants CURRY, RANSDELL. (Paul, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk as to 1) Sergeant Curry; 2) Sergeant Ransdell. (JRB) |
Filing 8
Order Screening Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - If theplaintiff believes that additional claims were alleged in the complaint, but not identified by the Court, he shall have through November 30, 2020, in which to identify those claims. This Order does not prevent the defendants from filing a motion to dismiss if one is appropriate. The clerk shall terminate Duane Burgess as a defendant on the docket. The clerk is directed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to the defendants in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint, dkt. #2 , applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Wavier of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Order. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to parties via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 10/28/2020.(JRB)
|
| Filing 7 RECEIPT #IP071268 for partial filing fee in the amount of $16.00, paid by LEVI WALSMAN. (DJH) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Sixteen Dollars and Zero Cents ($16.00). The plaintiff shall have through October 26, 2020, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 9/30/2020. (JRB)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (TMC) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff LEVI WALSMAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Transaction history)(REO) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against DUANE BURGESS, CURRY, RANSDELL, filed by LEVI WALSMAN. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(REO) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by LEVI WALSMAN located at BRANCHVILLE CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by LEVI WALSMAN to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
