Cases 1 - 10 of 14
YOUNG v. MCLAUGHIN et al
as 1:2024cv02231
Defendant:
DUANE BURGESS, TREAN MCLAUGHIN and ADREW BARNHART
Plaintiff:
DEONTE YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. MCLAUGHIN et al
as 1:2024cv02230
Petitioner:
DEONTE YOUNG
Respondent:
TREAN MCLAUGHIN, DUANE BURGESS and ADREW BARNHART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FARAFONOV v. BURGESS
as 1:2024cv01363
Respondent:
DUANE BURGESS
Petitioner:
ANDREI FARAFONOV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MAYO v. BURGESS et al
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
BRIANNA MAYO
Defendant:
SHERIFF DUANE BURGESS, JOHNSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CHARLES J WARREN, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BOLING v. BURGESS
as 1:2021cv02208
Plaintiff:
JAMES S BOLING
Defendant:
DUANE BURGESS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEWART v. JOHNSON COUNTY SHERRIFF'S OFFICE - JAIL DIVISION et al
as 1:2021cv01509
Defendant:
SHERIFF DUANE BURGESS, JOHNSON COUNTY SHERRIFF'S OFFICE - JAIL DIVISION, YET UNIDENTIFIED OFFICERS and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN STEWART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALSMAN v. BURGESS et al
as 3:2020cv00219
Defendant:
DUANE BURGESS, CURRY and RANSDELL
Plaintiff:
LEVI WALSMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWIFT v. BURGESS et al
as 1:2019cv02354
Defendant:
DUANE BURGESS and JOHNSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SWIFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEPHERD v. COX et al
as 1:2019cv00575
Defendant:
CORPORAL HAUSE, C.O. MOORE, SHERIFF DOUG COX and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID L SHEPHERD, JR. and DAVID L. SHEPHERD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLEDSOE v. COX et al
as 1:2019cv00212
Defendant:
C.O. Butcher, Major DUANE BURGESS, C.O. Kendall and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle R Bledsoe and KYLE R. BLEDSOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
