WALKER v. FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA et al
| PAMELA WALKER and BRENT HOUSER |
| JANE DOES 1-3, JOHN DOES 1-3, FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA, DARRELL MILLS, STEVE KNIGHT and RANDY HUBBARD |
| 4:2007cv00014 |
| February 6, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| New Albany Office |
| Floyd |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| William G. Hussmann |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
182
ORDER granting 172 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement. Counsel for Defendants should tender a check in the appropriate amount, a release, and stipulation of dismissal to Mr. Farnsley within 7 days of the date of this Order. Mr. Farnsley is di rected to sign and return the stipulation of dismissal and release within 7 days thereafter, if he chooses to accept the Court's ruling and the settlement payment. In any event, a final judgment shall enter dismissing his case based upon the settlement reached on or about September 30, 2010. See order for details. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 8/27/2010. (LBT) Modified on 8/27/2010 to correct a typographical error in docket text (LBT).
|
|
Filing
123
ENTRY ON MOTIONS TO INTERVENE. 106 Motion to Intervene, 117 Motion to Intervene, and 119 Motion to Intervene are each GRANTED. 115 Motion for Leave to File Supplement to Motion to Intervene is GRANTED as well. See Entry for particulars. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 7/22/2009. (LBT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
