Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Lim v. Siam Lim et al
as 3:2022cv04605
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Allison Meow Siam Lim, Chong Kwan Tan, Goh Chok Tong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Lim, Khor v. Tong, Goh et al
as 3:2021cv00781
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Goh Chok Tong, Barack Obama, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lim v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2021cv01277
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, Goh Chok Tong, President Barack Obama and others
Floyd County, Indiana, et al v. Tabitha Gentry, et al
as 16-8014
Petitioner:
FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA, DARRELL MILLS, Individually and in his capacity as Floyd County Sheriff, TIFFANY FRANS, Individually and others
Respondent:
TABITHA GENTRY, VINCENT MINTON, MICHAEL HERRON and others
BURGESS v. FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 4:2016cv00025
Defendant:
OFFICER ATHERTON, JOHN/JANE DOE, FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN BURGESS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GENTRY et al v. FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 4:2014cv00054
Defendant:
OFFICER ATHERTON, JOHN/JANE DOE, FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA and others
Plaintiff:
TABITHA GENTRY, MICHAEL HERRON, VINCENT MINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STORMS v. FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 4:2013cv00143
Defendant:
ROBERT ARCHIBALD, KEISHA BROOKS, ETHAN BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY STORMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TURNER v. MILLS et al
as 4:2013cv00085
Defendant:
DARRELL MILLS, KYLE SMITH and ROBBIE WOODRUFF
Plaintiff:
CHARLES D. TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROGERS v. MILLS
as 4:2012cv00060
Defendant:
DARRELL MILLS
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sprows v. Evans et al
as 7:2011cv00090
Plaintiff:
Norvin L. Sprows
Defendant:
Kelly Evans and Darrell Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
