DUNN v. JONES et al
| LARRY ANDREW DUNN, JR. |
| SAM BEARD, CONLIN, HOWARD and BRAD JONES |
| 4:2017cv00173 |
| September 11, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| New Albany Office |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
Entry Granting Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, Discussing Complaint, and Directing Further Proceedings - Plaintiff Larry Dunn's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. 2 , is granted. The assessment of an initial partial filing fee is no t feasible at this time. Based on the screening described above, Dunn's claims shall proceed as claims that the defendants have violated his constitutional rights by ignoring his medical needs. If Dunn believes he has raised a claim that his not identified in this Entry, he shall have through October 2, 2017, to notify the Court. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to the defendants in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint, applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/13/2017. (MAT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
