Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff: Jacob C Johnson
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2013cv00042
Filed: April 22, 2013
Court: Iowa Northern District Court
Office: Cedar Rapids Office
County: Benton
Presiding Judge: Linda R Reade
Referring Judge: Jon S Scoles
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 19, 2014 17 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER re 3 Complaint filed by Jacob C Johnson. This matter is reversed and remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to sentence four of 42 USC 405(g). Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Jon S Scoles on 5/19/2014. (pac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacob C Johnson
Represented By: Thomas A Krause
Represented By: Jeffrey P Berg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.