Johnson v. Fayram
Petitioner: Joseph Leo Johnson
Respondent: John Fayram
Case Number: 1:2014cv00040
Filed: March 27, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Office: Cedar Rapids Office
County: Jones
Presiding Judge: Linda R Reade
Presiding Judge: Jon S Scoles
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2254 filed by Joseph Leo Johnson. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in favor of the respondent, John Fayram, and against the petitioner, Joseph Leo Johnson. In addition, a certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Chief Judge Linda R Reade on 11/7/16. (ksy)(copy w/NEF to Plf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Fayram
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Joseph Leo Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John Fayram
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?