College Park TIC 1, LLC et al v. Carden
| College Park TIC 1, LLC, College Park TIC 2, LLC, College Park TIC 3, LLC, College Park TIC 4, LLC, College Park TIC 5, LLC, College Park TIC 6, LLC, College Park TIC 7, LLC, College Park TIC 8, LLC, College Park TIC 9, LLC, College Park TIC 10, LLC, College Park TIC 11, LLC, College Park TIC 12, LLC, College Park TIC 13, LLC, College Park TIC 14, LLC, College Park TIC 15, LLC, College Park TIC 16, LLC, College Park TIC 17, LLC, College Park TIC 18, LLC, College Park TIC 19, LLC, College Park TIC 20, LLC, College Park TIC 22, LLC, College Park TIC 23, LLC, College Park TIC 24, LLC, College Park TIC 25, LLC and College Park TIC 26, LLC |
| William J Carden |
| 1:2016cv00044 |
| March 24, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Cedar Rapids Office |
| Linn |
| Jon S Scoles |
| Leonard T Strand |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment - denying 31 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 32 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 53 Plaintiffs' Motion Request for Ruling on Pending Motions for Summary Judgment. This case will proceed to trial as scheduled. Signed by Chief Judge Leonard T Strand on 9/29/2017. (src)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
