Kilpatrick v. CRST Expedited, Inc et al
| Roxan Kilpatrick |
| CRST Expedited, Inc, North American Driver Training Academy, LLC and Dennis Harrington |
| 1:2016cv00071 |
| May 19, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Cedar Rapids Office |
| Linn |
| Mark W Bennett |
| CJ Williams |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
OPINION and Order Regarding Defendants Motion For Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs Request to Set Trial Date. Granting 16 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by North American Driver Training Academy, LLC, CRST Expedited, Inc, Dennis Har rington. Denying 28 Pro Se Request For Trial Date filed by Roxan Kilpatrick. Denying without prejudice 20 Motion in Limine filed by North American Driver Training Academy, LLC, CRST Expedited, Inc, Dennis Harrington. Pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter Kilpatricks default on the record re 4 Counterclaim filed by CRST Expedited, Inc. I will consider any motions pursuant to Rule 55(b) or (c) as the result of the entry of default. If no action is taken on or before 3/23/2018, I will dismiss the counterclaim for lack of prosecution. Signed by Judge Mark W Bennett on 2/22/2018. (copy w/nef mailed to plaintiff) (des)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
