Snitselaar v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
||UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and Mount Mercy University
||February 10, 2017
||US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
||Cedar Rapids Office
||Edward J McManus
|Nature of Suit:
||Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|April 17, 2019
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 48 Motion for Attorney Fees. Mount Mercy is hereby ordered to pay $2,063.50 in attorney fees within 30 days of the date of the instant order. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case. See text of Order. Signed by Judge Linda R Reade on 04/17/2019. (eFinance) (jjh)
|January 22, 2019
ORDER re 25 Amended Complaint filed by Michelle Snitselaar: Defendant Unum Life Insurance Company of America's decision to deny benefits is affirmed. Snitselaar's second claim for relief, Count II of the Amended Complaint, against De fendant Mount Mercy University for breach of fiduciary duty is valid and equitable relief is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in favor of Snitselaar against Mount Mercy in the amount of $60,000. Snitselaar may file an ap plication for attorney fees within 10 days of the issuance of the instant order. Defendants may respond to any such application within 10 days of the application. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case for administrative purposes. Signed by Judge Linda R Reade on 1/22/2019. (skm)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?