Raymond v. Iowa, State of
Plaintiff: James Dean Raymond
Defendant: Iowa, State of
Case Number: 1:2017cv00089
Filed: July 28, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Office: Cedar Rapids Office
County: Jones
Presiding Judge: Linda R Reade
Presiding Judge: CJ Williams
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER. The clerks office is directed to update the respondent in this case to William Sperfslage. Granting 4 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The clerks office is directed to enter judgment in favor of the respondent. A certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Judge Linda R Reade on 5/30/2018. (copy w/nef to non-ecf filer) (des)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Raymond v. Iowa, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Dean Raymond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Iowa, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?