Sulzner v. Iowa, State of et al
Plaintiff: Justin Paul Sulzner
Defendant: Judge Richard Stochl, Judge John Bauercamper, David Hanson, Iowa, State of and Judge Margaret Lingreen
Case Number: 1:2021cv00013
Filed: February 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Presiding Judge: Mark A Roberts
Referring Judge: CJ Williams
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2021 Filing 3 PRO SE AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Justin Paul Sulzner. (NEF mailed to Pltf) (jjh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/2/2021: #1 Amended 1983 Complaint) (jjh).
February 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER denying #1 Pro Se Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Justin Paul Sulzner. Plaintiff must either pay the filing fee or file an amended application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant plaintiff 30 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint which is signed and states a claim under Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint in compliance with Rule 8, the complaint will be stricken from the record and his case will be dismissed with no further order of the Court. Signed by Judge CJ Williams on 2/4/2021 (copy w/NEF mailed to Plt). (skm)
February 1, 2021 Filing 1 PRO SE MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Justin Paul Sulzner. (Attachments: #1 Complaint - not signed) (NEF mailed to plaintiff) (pac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sulzner v. Iowa, State of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Judge Richard Stochl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Judge John Bauercamper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Hanson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Iowa, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Judge Margaret Lingreen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Justin Paul Sulzner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?