Sulzner v. Iowa, State of et al
Justin Paul Sulzner |
Judge Richard Stochl, Judge John Bauercamper, David Hanson, Iowa, State of and Judge Margaret Lingreen |
1:2021cv00013 |
February 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
Mark A Roberts |
CJ Williams |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 PRO SE AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Justin Paul Sulzner. (NEF mailed to Pltf) (jjh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/2/2021: #1 Amended 1983 Complaint) (jjh). |
Filing 2 ORDER denying #1 Pro Se Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Justin Paul Sulzner. Plaintiff must either pay the filing fee or file an amended application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant plaintiff 30 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint which is signed and states a claim under Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint in compliance with Rule 8, the complaint will be stricken from the record and his case will be dismissed with no further order of the Court. Signed by Judge CJ Williams on 2/4/2021 (copy w/NEF mailed to Plt). (skm) |
Filing 1 PRO SE MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Justin Paul Sulzner. (Attachments: #1 Complaint - not signed) (NEF mailed to plaintiff) (pac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.