Tyson v. Larson et al
James Charles Tyson, Sr |
Jeremy Larson, Jeffery Thompson, Thomas Miller and Jeffery S Thompson |
1:2021cv00049 |
May 4, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
Judge Kelly KE Mahoney |
Leonard T Strand |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Dismissal Pursuant to Local Rule 41(a)(4): Unless appropriate action is taken by 7/7/2021, this action will be dismissed. Signed by Clerk on 6/23/2021. (Attachments: #1 LR 41) (mailed to Pltf per PSLC) (jjh) |
Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Pro Se Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff James Charles Tyson, Sr (PSLC) (NEF mailed to plaintiff) (sgw) |
Filing 3 PRO SE Correspondence by James Charles Tyson, Sr. (PSLC) (NEF w/docket sheet and clerk reply mailed to defendant) (sgw) |
Filing 2 ORDER denying #1 Pro Se Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by James Charles Tyson, Sr. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date of this order to pay the full $402 filing fee. If Plaintiff does not pay the filing fee, this case will be dismissed with no further order of the court. See Order. Signed by Chief Judge Leonard T Strand on 5/6/2021. (NEF w/copy mailed to Plaintiff) (sgw) |
Filing 1 PRO SE MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff James Charles Tyson, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (NEF mailed to plaintiff) (pac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.