Runyon v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
Robert Runyon |
Iowa Department of Corrections, Matt Louvar, Beth Skinner, Randy Gibbs, Mike Hienricy and Kathy Eschen |
1:2021cv00082 |
September 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
Judge Kelly KE Mahoney |
CJ Williams |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Robert Runyon. (Filed as such pursuant to #3 Order)(NEF mailed to plaintiff) (sgw) |
Filing 3 ORDER re #1 Pro Se Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and #2 Pro Se Motion to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Robert Runyon. The Clerk of Court is directed to file the complaint without the prepayment of fees and costs for the purpose of transferring the case, retain a copy of the file, and send the entire file to the Southern District of Iowa. Case electronically transferred to District of Southern District of Iowa. Signed by Judge CJ Williams on 9/16/21. (NEF w/copy mailed to plaintiff) (sgw) |
Filing 2 PRO SE MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Robert Runyon. (ksy)(NEF to Plf)(PSLC) |
Filing 1 PRO SE MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Robert Runyon. (Attachments: #1 1983 Complaint) (ksy)(NEF to Plf)(PSLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.