Nezerka v. BG Brecke, Inc
| Parker A Nezerka |
| B.G. Brecke, Inc. and BG Brecke, Inc |
| 1:2022cv00009 |
| February 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Mark A Roberts |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 38 U.S.C. ยง 4323 USERAA - Enforcement of rights with respect to state or private employer |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set Deadline: Defendant BG Brecke, Inc's LR 7.1 Disclosure Statement due by 4/13/2022. (pac) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER With Jury Demand to #1 Complaint by BG Brecke, Inc.(Fagan, Brian) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Parker A Nezerka. BG Brecke, Inc served on 3/14/2022, answer due 4/04/2022 (Tronvold, Jeffrey) Modified text on 3/21/2022 (des) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to B.G. Brecke, Inc. ****PLEASE MAKE COPIES OF SUMMONS FOR EACH DEFENDANT AND FILL IN REMAINING INFORMATION**** (Attachments: #1 New Civil Actions Case Packet) (skm) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge. Check status by 3/9/2022. (skm) |
| Magistrate Judge Mark A Roberts added (no conflicts found). (skm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand against B.G. Brecke, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AIANDC-3618237.), filed by Parker A Nezerka. Scheduling Report due by 5/5/2022 (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Tronvold, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
