Hatchett v. Warner et al
| Brandon Gerard Hatchett |
| Steve Warner, Doug Gudunkuf, Cedar Rapids Police Department and Naomi Ren Lee |
| 1:2022cv00045 |
| May 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Mark A Roberts |
| Leonard T Strand |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT in favor of Cedar Rapids Police Department, Doug Gudunkuf, Naomi Ren Lee, Steve Warner against Brandon Gerard Hatchett. Signed by Clerk on 5/25/2022. (copy mailed to Pltf) (jjh) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Brandon Gerard Hatchett. (NEF mailed to Pltf) (jjh) |
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting #1 Pro Se Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis: The Clerks office is directed to file the complaint without the prepayment of fees. The complaint is denied for failing to state a claim and this case is hereby dismissed. Signed by Chief Judge Leonard T Strand on 5/25/2022. (copy mailed to Pltf) (jjh)
|
| Filing 1 PRO SE MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Brandon Gerard Hatchett. (Attachments: #1 1983 Complaint) (ksy)(NEF to Plf)(filed per PSLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
