Garg v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al
| Gunjal Garg |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoz Jaddou and Terri Robinson |
| 1:2023cv00014 |
| March 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Mark A Roberts |
| CJ Williams |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice by Gunjal Garg (Nuzum, Matthew) |
| ***Civil Case Terminated pursuant to #3 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (jag) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoz Jaddou, Terri Robinson, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. ****PLEASE MAKE COPIES OF SUMMONS FOR EACH DEFENDANT AND FILL IN REMAINING INFORMATION**** (Attachments: #1 Civil Actions New Case Packet) (jag) |
| Judge CJ Williams and Magistrate Judge Mark A Roberts added. No conflicts identified. (jag) |
| *** Attorney Timothy T Duax terminated. Erroneously added to the case upon opening by Attorney Nuzum (jag) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoz Jaddou, and Terri Robinson ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AIANDC-3874594.), filed by Gunjal Garg. Scheduling Report due by 6/5/2023 (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Nuzum, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
