Hicks v. Catton et al
| Christian Sean Hicks |
| Officer Michael Lee Catton, Officer Nicholas Raymond Mark, Officer Nicholas J Berger, Officer James William Allison, Officer Dwight Maurice Mathews, Officer Corey James Hasley, Officer Aaron Michael Hoenig, Officer Robert Louis Cormier, Officer Jonathon Patrick Douglas and Officer Louis Adrian Castillo Mallillin |
| 1:2023cv00058 |
| July 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Mark A Roberts |
| Leonard T Strand |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER of Case Transfer to the Southern District of Iowa. The Clerk's office shall file the complaint without the prepayment of fees and costs for the purpose of transferring the case. Signed by Chief Judge Leonard T Strand on 7/31/2023. (Copy to Plaintiff, Case electronically transferred to Southern District of Iowa) (jlh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/31/2023: #1 Email Confirmation) (jlh).
|
| Filing 1 PRO SE MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Christian Sean Hicks (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (PSLC) (NEF to Plaintiff) (jlh) |
| Chief Judge Leonard T Strand and Magistrate Judge Mark A Roberts added. No conflicts identified. (jlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
