Pattison Sand Company, LLC v. Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission et al
Pattison Sand Company, LLC |
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission and Mine Safety and Health Administration |
2:2011cv01051 |
December 2, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
Eastern Dubuque Office |
Clayton |
Linda R Reade |
Jon S Scoles |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 ORDER denying 32 Motion to Extend Stay for 90 Days. The stay is hereby lifted. The Clerk of Court is directed to designate as pending the 23 Motion to Dismiss. If Plaintiff wishes to resist the Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff is directed to file a resistance on or before 9/7/2012. If Defendants wish to file a reply to any resistance, Defendants are directed to file a reply on or before 9/11/2012. Signed by Chief Judge Linda R Reade on 8/30/2012. (skm) |
Filing 18 ORDER denying 15 Motion to Set Aside/Reconsider 14 Order on Motion for TRO and Motion for Immediate Certification for Interlocutory Appeal (see text of Order for details). Signed by Chief Judge Linda R Reade on 01/23/2012. (skm) |
Filing 14 ORDER denying 11 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiff Pattison Sand Company, LLC (see text of Order for details). Signed by Chief Judge Linda R Reade on 12/30/2011. (skm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.