Moment v. Iowa, State of
Yoosuf Moment |
Iowa, State of, Dubuque County Jail, Dubuque County and Scott Nelson |
2:2019cv01029 |
October 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
Eastern Dubuque Office |
Mark A Roberts |
Leonard T Strand |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 SUPPLEMENT re #2 Pro Se Complaint and #9 Pro Se Amended Complaint by Yoosuf Moment (Pro Se Complaint originally filed in C19-1032-LTS - filed as such pursuant to #12 Order) (nef mailed to pro se plaintiff) (des) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #10 Pro Se Amended Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Prisoner Yoosuf Moment pay Initial Filing Fee of $73.68. Upon initial review, defendants State of Iowa and Scott Nelson are dismissed. Additionally, claim regarding state court prosecution is denied. Amended complaint due 30 days from the date of this order. Signed by Chief Judge Leonard T Strand on 12/4/2019. (copy w/nef and 1983 forms mailed to pro se plaintiff; copy/nef mailed to Warden/Administrator) (des) |
Filing 11 SUPPLEMENT to #10 Amended Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Yoosuf Moment (ksy) (NEF w/ 1983 packet mailed to Plf) Modified text on 11/15/2019 (pac). |
Filing 10 AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Yoosuf Moment (ksy)(NEF to Plf) |
Filing 9 AMENDED Complaint against Iowa, State of, filed by Yoosuf Moment. (ksy)(NEF to Plf) |
Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT to #9 Amended Complaint by Yoosuf Moment (ksy)(NEF to Plf) Modified on 11/7/2019 (ksy). |
Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT to #9 Amended Complaint by Yoosuf Moment (ksy)(NEF to Plf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/7/2019: #1 Unredacted Supplement) (ksy). Modified on 11/7/2019 (ksy). |
Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT to #9 Amended Complaint by Yoosuf Moment (ksy)(NEF to Plf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/7/2019: #1 Unredacted Supplement) (ksy). Modified on 11/7/2019 (ksy). |
Filing 5 ORDER denying #1 Pro Se Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is given thirty days from the date of this order to file a new motion to proceed in forma pauperis and an amended complaint. If plaintiff fails to file either an amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis or an amended complaint within thirty days, this case will be dismissed with no further order from the court. Signed by Chief Judge Leonard T Strand on 10/25/2019. (copy w/nef, IFP, 1983 and 2254 forms to non-ecf filer) (des) |
Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Arkansas Eastern; Case Number 4:19-cv-00733. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA DOCKET BEGINS HERE (copy of docket sheet to non-ecf filer) (PSLC notified) Modified on 10/24/2019 (des) |
Chief Judge Leonard T Strand and Magistrate Judge Mark A Roberts added. No conflicts identified. (des) |
Filing 3 ORDER transferring this case immediately to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, Eastern Division. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/23/2019. (jak) [Transferred from Arkansas Eastern on 10/24/2019.] |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Doe, filed by Yoosuf Moment.(kdr) [Transferred from Arkansas Eastern on 10/24/2019.] |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Yoosuf Moment. (kdr) [Transferred from Arkansas Eastern on 10/24/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.