Satrom v. Commissioner of Social Security
Trevor J. Satrom and Trevor J Satrom |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2020cv01042 |
September 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
Judge Kelly KE Mahoney |
Leonard T Strand |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jacob A Schunk on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security. (Schunk, Jacob) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security. ****PLEASE MAKE COPIES OF SUMMONS FOR EACH DEFENDANT AND FILL IN REMAINING INFORMATION**** (Attachments: #1 Civil Social Security new case packet) (des) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Trevor J Satrom. Dismissal Deadline 1/3/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (des) |
Filing 2 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk is ordered to file the complaint and issue a summons. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly K.E. Mahoney on 9/22/2020. (des) |
Chief Judge Leonard T Strand and Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly K.E. Mahoney added. No conflicts identified. (kms) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Trevor J. Satrom (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Kappelman, Wes) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.