Sprint Communications Company, LP v. Butler-Bremer Mutual Telephone Company et al
| Sprint Communications Company, LP |
| Winnebago Cooperative Telecom Association, Webster-Calhoun Cooperative Telephone Association, Farmers Mutual Telephone Cooperative of Shellsberg, Iowa, North English Cooperative Telephone Company, Mabel Cooperative Telephone Company, Heart of Iowa Communications Cooperative, Goldfield Telephone Company, Farmers Cooperative Telephone Company, Coon Creek Telephone Company, Clear Lake Independent Telephone Company and Butler-Bremer Mutual Telephone Company |
| 3:2014cv03028 |
| May 7, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Central Division Office |
| Cerro Gordo |
| Mark W Bennett |
| Leonard T Strand |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part, denying in part, and reserving in part 8 MOTION to Dismiss or Stay and Refer to FCC - Oral Argument Requested. See Order for details. This action is stayed pending completion of administrative proceedings before the FCC. The parties shall file a status report concerning the need for additional proceedings in this court, if any, upon conclusion of the administrative proceedings. Signed by Judge Mark W Bennett on 10/6/14. (djs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
