Andrew, MD v. Hamilton County Public Hospital et al
| Mark H Andrew |
| Hamilton County Public Hospital and Lori Rathbun |
| 3:2017cv03053 |
| June 5, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Central Division Office |
| Hamilton |
| Mark W Bennett |
| CJ Williams |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
OPINION and Order granting in part and denying in part 32 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The part of the summary judgment as to the age discrimination claims in Count III of the First Amended Complaint is granted, and summary judgment on th at claim shall enter accordingly. The remaining parts of the Motion, seeking partial summary judgment on Count I and summary judgment on the entirety of Counts II, IV, and V, is denied without prejudice. The remaining claims in Counts I, II, IV, and V, are remanded to the Iowa District Court for Hamilton County. Signed by Judge Mark W Bennett on 8/30/2018. (des)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 24 Motion for Extension of Time for Scheduling Order Deadlines by Mark H Andrew. Plaintiffs Expert Witnesses due by 12/6/2017. Defendants Expert Witnesses due by 2/6/2018. Plaintiffs Rebuttal Experts due by 3/6/2018. All other deadlines, and the trial date, will remain unchanged. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge CJ Williams on 11/6/2017. (skm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
