Otis v. Union Pacific Railroad Co
Plaintiff: David Otis
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Co
Case Number: 3:2018cv03009
Filed: January 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Office: Central Division Office
County: Franklin
Presiding Judge: CJ Williams
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12112
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER granting 23 Joint Motion for Producing Documents and Electronically Stored Information. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge CJ Williams on 5/3/2018. (skm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Otis v. Union Pacific Railroad Co
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Otis
Represented By: Charles A Delbridge
Represented By: Thomas Andrew Newkirk
Represented By: David Einer Schlesinger
Represented By: Jill M Zwagerman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Co
Represented By: Allison Dana Balus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?