Kanak v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| SMITHA KANAK |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, Terri Robinson and Ur Mendoz Jaddou |
| 3:2023cv03004 |
| February 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Mark A Roberts |
| CJ Williams |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice by Smitha Kanak (Nuzum, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss by Plaintiff Smitha Kanak Responses due by 4/21/2023 (Nuzum, Matthew) |
| ***Civil Case Terminated pursuant to #4 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (jag) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoz Jaddou, Terri Robinson, and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. ****PLEASE MAKE COPIES OF SUMMONS FOR EACH DEFENDANT AND FILL IN REMAINING INFORMATION**** (Attachments: #1 Civil Actions New Case Packet) (jag) |
| Judge CJ Williams and Magistrate Judge Mark A Roberts added. No conflicts identified. (jag) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur Mendoz Jaddou, Terri Robinson, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AIANDC-3860302.), filed by Smitha Kanak. Scheduling Report due by 5/15/2023 (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Nuzum, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
