Sickler v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
| Travis Edward Sickler |
| Iowa Department of Corrections and Fort Dodge Correctional Facility |
| 3:2023cv03050 |
| November 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Judge Kelly KE Mahoney |
| Leonard T Strand |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Iowa Southern; Case Number 4:23-cv-00450. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. Modified on 11/28/2023 (des). NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA DOCKET BEGINS HERE (PSLC notified) (Docket Sheet to Plaintiff) |
| Chief Judge Leonard T Strand and Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly K.E. Mahoney added. No conflicts identified. (des) |
Filing 3
ORDER Transferring Case. See order for particulars. Signed by Judge Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger on 11/27/2023. Copy of order mailed by chambers to plaintiff. (h) [Transferred from Iowa Southern on 11/28/2023.]
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Travis Edward Sickler. (btg) [Transferred from Iowa Southern on 11/28/2023.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Travis Edward Sickler. (btg) [Transferred from Iowa Southern on 11/28/2023.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
