United States of America v. 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Case Number: 5:2007cv04114
Filed: December 28, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Office: Western Division Office
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: Donald E OBrien
Presiding Judge: Paul A Zoss
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 30 JUDGMENT - Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant, a 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee, VIN. No. 1J4GW48N7YC303169, License No. 70-J870, and the Claimant, Maria DeLeon and against the United States of America - The United States of America shall permit the Claimant, Maria DeLeon, to recover the Defendant Jeep from wherever it is being held forthwith. Signed by Clerk on 06/04/09. (kfs)
October 23, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 8 Motion for Summary Judgment. Granted as to the forfeitability of the defendant vehicle and denied as to DeLeon's innocent owner defense. The innocent owner issue is the only remaining issue in dispute that will be submitted to the trier of fact. Signed by Senior Judge Donald E O'Brien on 10/23/08. (des).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?