Reeder v. Carroll
Plaintiff: Ralph F Reeder, Jr
Defendant: Thomas J Carroll
Case Number: 5:2009cv04013
Filed: February 15, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Office: Assault Libel & Slander Office
County: Woodbury
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: Mark W Bennett
Presiding Judge: Paul A Zoss
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER granting 45 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendant Thomas Carroll, M.D. and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Linda R Reade on 12/21/10. (ksy)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reeder v. Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ralph F Reeder, Jr
Represented By: Charles T Patterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas J Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?