Waterman v. VS Holding Company et al
| Randy Waterman |
| VS Holding Company and Steven K Vande Brake |
| 5:2010cv04038 |
| May 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Western Division Office |
| Sioux |
| Mark W Bennett |
| Antitrust |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
309
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 286 Motion For An Award of Attorneys' Fees, The Reimbursement Of Expenses, And Incentive Awards For Class Representatives (See Order Text). Signed by Judge Mark W Bennett on 11/9/2011. (des)
|
|
Filing
207
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - granting 149 MOTION to Dismiss filed by GCC Alliance Concrete, Inc, 150 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Consolidated Complaint filed by Steven Keith Vande Brake, 151 MOTION to Dismiss filed by VS Holding Company, 153 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Consolidated Complaint filed by Kent Robert Stewart, Great Lakes Concrete Inc, and 189 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Consolidated Complaint filed by Tri-State Ready-Mix I nc, Chad Van Zee, to the extent that the Amended Consolidated Complaint (docket no. 177 ). The plaintiffs shall have to and including 3/29/2011, within which to file a motion for leave to amend their complaint, accompanied by a proposed amended complaint. If no such motion and proposed amended complaint are received by this deadline, this action will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Mark W Bennett on 03/08/2011. (src)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
